Why teams switch
The three complaints we hear constantly: seat pricing that punishes hiring growth, InMail credits that vanish whether you use them or not, and candidate reply rates that have fallen for years as recruiters all pile into the same inbox. For a team hiring under 30 roles a year, the math stops working long before the contract renews.
Connection-gated messaging beats InMail volume
InMail rewards cold-blast volume. Connection-gated messaging rewards relevance: candidates accept the connection, then you talk. Reply rates run 3-5× higher because the candidate has already opted in, and you stop paying per message that goes ignored.
Flat pricing for the whole team
Add sourcers without adding seats. Sourcing volume isn't taxed and there's no upsell every time a contractor joins for a sprint. One team plan covers your whole recruiting pod.
Where LinkedIn Recruiter still wins
We're honest about the trade. If you need a 600M-profile passive database and you have the budget for enterprise Recruiter, LinkedIn still leads on raw breadth. For everyone else, agencies, startups, in-house teams under 50, the cost-per-hire wins with us.